|
17th
& 18th C
|
|
Roman
Early 19th C Quizzes
and Jigsaws |
There are references to Galloways in Shakespeare (1597):—
Dr Johnson later construed the term "Galloway nags" as "common hackneys", carrying the modern sense of "we can spot rubbish when we see it". And in a satire by Bishop Hall also published in 1597:—
Gervase Markham in 1660 wrote:
John Spreull (1646-1722) in 1706 wrote that he bought and sold "fine Scots galloway horses". He stated:
Daniel Defoe (1660-1731) wrote in his "Tour Through Scotland":
So we have two views of the value of the Galloway: one, that he's "common", both in the sense of numbers and by direct comparison with the high class racehorse; and the other, that he is short, strong and infinitely useful. He is a Toyota pickup or a twelve-year-old Ford or Vauxhall hatchback, as opposed to a Ferrari. RACING ADVERTISEMENTS: Newcastle CourantThe "Courant" was the nearest thing to a Cumbrian local paper at the time.
Notice that the terms of the races vary - 4 July [1777] is weight-for-age, and 5 July is weight-for-height, where 14 hands is the mean. The distances were quite usual for the time: three heats of 4 miles. The much shorter distances of today were introduced as tests or "futurities" to determine the ability of horses younger than four years and their suitability for longer races in adult life. Fast single races between 5 furlongs and 2 miles have now become the norm due to economic pressures (over shorter distances, horses can compete sooner). Hence the earlier maturity of the modern racing Thoroughbred, when compared with mountain and moorland breeds of pony. It is sometimes forgotten, when discussing the foundation sires of the TB, that the Darley Arabian, Byerley Turk and Godolphin Arabian could not reproduce themselves in a vacuum! They were crossed onto British mares, the "running horses" and "Galloways"; that is, sisters of the ancestresses of our present native breeds. The Curwen family of West Cumbria (see below) were breeders of horses for similar races to those in the advertisements shown here, and their animals were known by the name of "Galloways". Surveys However, Andrew Pringle, writing in official mode for the Board of Agriculture in 1794, noted that "The (Westmorland) Commons are numerous, extensive and valuable ..." and added that they were mainly stocked with Scotch sheep, black cattle and geese. He observed frustratingly briefly that "a few ponies of the Scotch breed are reared upon the commons, but the practice not being general, need not be dilated upon." (Pringle) Fortunately small newspaper advertisements of the period give us more detail about the "Scotch" type of pony. It seems reasonable to assume the "Scotch" pony is the same as the "Galloway", given that Galloway, Scotland, is just across the Solway from Cumbria; Pringle did not seem to think it necessary to explain his term, which suggests it may have been in common use and widely understood. Support for this comes from Tuke, writing, in the same national survey, of the North Riding of Yorkshire: "Horses constitute a considerable part of the stock of the high parts of the western moorlands; the farmers there generally keep a few Scotch Galloways, which they put to stallions of the country, and produce a hardy and very strong race in proportion to their size, which are chiefly sold to the manufacturing part of the West Riding and Lancashire, to be employed in ordinary purposes." (More notes on the 1794 surveys of Northumberland, Cumberland and Westmorland can be found on the Countryside half of the site.) His counterparts Bailey and Culley wrote of the horses of Northumberland: "those bred in the county are of various sorts, descended from stallions of various kinds, from the full blood racer, to the strong, heavy, rough-legged black. From the full-blood stallions and country mares, are bred excellent hunters, road and carriage horses, and from the other kinds of stallions are bred the draught horses, which in general, are middle sized, active animals, well adapted to the husbandry of this county." In his own part of this 1794 survey, for the Galloway region, Webster wrote that: "Tradition states that the antient Galloway horses sprang from a Spanish breed, which escaped from a vessel of the Armada that was wrecked upon the coast. Some of these are yet to be met with; their shape, which is in general good, does not exceed their other properties, being esteemed high spirited, very hardy and easily maintained." On the Scottish side of the Border, similar Parish surveys were conducted between 1791 and 1799 in which it was noted: from Twynholme (Kirkcudbright, Galloway region): "The old breed of Galloways, so highly valued for spirit and shape, and which continued a long time after the wreck of the Spanish Armada, when several stallions were thrown upon this coast, is almost entirely, if not totally extinct." [How much trust one can put in the "Spanish Armada" story, I am not sure; it crops up in other breed backgrounds as well, and to believe it as a source for all of them stretches credulity quite a long way. It may in reality reflect a continuous tradition of trade along the Atlantic seaboards from very early times, that has by default become attached to this one seaborne historical event.] These Parish surveys in the Dumfries and Galloway areas yield almost no other comment on specific horse breeds, though from Wigtown (Wigtownshire, Galloway region) it was reported: "… the breed of horses has been greatly improved. The little galloways, the native produce of this place, are totally worn out; and a breed much larger, and abler for the purposes of agriculture, brought originally from the West of Scotland, has been introduced." A further survey in 1814 drew the following remarks on Galloways:
130 years after Gervase Markham's observations, this type of strong, clean-boned pony had more or less vanished as a breed. GaitAdvertisements of the 18th C indicate that the term "Galloway" was also applied locally to smaller ponies, down to 11 or 12 hands. As we saw above, there were races in Cumberland for "Galloways" of 14 hands, and also on the same day for "horses" of 14 hands, so the distinction cannot have been solely one of height but must have been based on type, breeding or perhaps the gaits at which they worked best. Although Defoe mentioned that they were "easy pacers" he may only have meant that they were a comfortable ride; we can't be sure from this whether they trotted "square" or were "gaited", ie, moved laterally in the pace, or in four-beat time in a running walk, singlefoot or rack. Height or Type? As for the "ponies" of 13 hands, while the earliest use we know of the term "pony" is recorded in the mid-17th C (1659, powny, from Scottish, apparently from Fr. poulenet "little foal"), Lawrence asserted in 1829: A horse below thirteen hands in height … is styled a poney; above that height, and below fourteen hands, a galloway. Fashion, however, rules the roast in all things, and of late it has become the ton to nickname galloways, and almost sized horses, ponies, quasi pets; and I have lately heard Tattersall [horse auctioneer in London] himself announce, from the pulpit, a poney for sale, which bordered very nearly on fourteen hands. The word or term has also been, of late years, curtailed, as I humbly conceive, of its fair orthographical proportion. It is now spelled pony, a literal abridgement, according to my observation, by that celebrated journal The Times, by way of the laudable economy of a single letter in an advertisement. Galloway seems to have begun life as a breed-type appellation, then been adopted as a generic term based mainly on height - rather as the term "hoover" has been adopted for "vacuum-cleaner". Before making any judgements on usefulness or commonness by height it is helpful to have some data about the heights of horses in, for instance, military use: the British Army's 2nd Dragoons in 1813 (Morgan) employed animals of the following heights: 16 hands, 57 horses More than half the Dragoons were mounted on horses of "galloway" size. William Youatt wrote in 1831:
He does not call the Galloways "ponies" although in other places he talks later of Exmoor and Dartmoor ponies, both of which fit the "under 13 hands" criterion (and which, he says, are ugly!).
Again, the term "clean" legs is used - which probably implied the flat, flinty quality of bone that we see in a good Fell or Dales pony today, not that the legs carried no feather. (The preference for large amounts of feather is a modern one, and a small amount of feather was probably an old characteristic of all the British natives; see the discussion on horses in Chaucer's time.) Although Youatt and Sinclair both said that the pure stock was nearly impossible to find by the 1820s, the term "galloway" was still in use in Cumbria in very recent times (I heard it in spontaneous use by farmers in 1985) for any stout general purpose pony, but particularly the Fell, often under the combined expression "fell-galloway". It seems very likely that the ancestors of our modern Fells included Galloways. Youatt adds that "many of the galloways now in use are procured from Wales or the New Forest; but they have materially diminished in number." Here he is probably using the term in its generic sense rather than a breed name. Youatt also quotes Dr Anderson:
Literary references Sir Walter Scott in The Fair Maid of Perth (1828) describes a smith riding a "strong black horse of the old Galloway breed, of an under size, and not exceeding fourteen hands, but high-shouldered, strong-limbed, well-coupled, and round-barrelled … A judge of the animal might see in his eye that vicious temper which is frequently the accompaniment of the form that is most vigorous and enduring, but the weight, the hand, and the seat of the rider, added to the late regular exercise of a long journey, had subdued his stubbornness for the present." Scott contrasts it satirically with another's "great trampling Flemish mare ... with a huge piece of hair on each foot and every hoof full as large in circumference as a frying pan". Endurance: the same tale twice toldJonty Wilson, the Kirkby Lonsdale blacksmith, wrote in 1978 of a feat of endurance performed in the 18th century by a Galloway based in Kirkby Lonsdale. Edward Linsay (a Scot who is said to have arrived in Cumbria with the Old Pretender's army in 1715) went into partnership with Thomas Singleton as a carrier using packhorses. They were based in Kirkby Lonsdale at the rear of the Queen's Head inn. (Wilson) Singleton was evidently the more sporting-minded of the two, being interested in cockfighting and dogfighting. He took a wager of 100 guineas that he could ride 1000 miles in 1000 hours. He rode for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and Wilson says it took him nearly 7 weeks -- although 1000 hours is just under 6 weeks. He rode one of the partnership's pack horses, a 13-2 Fell stallion named Black Sampson. When the pony died it was buried near Biggins, in Kirkby Lonsdale. Wilson wrote that he knew the exact spot. Note: F W Garnett (1910) and C Richardson (1990) both quote Youatt's version. They cite this as happening in 1701, and give the rider's name from that source as Sinclair: "A galloway, belonging to Mr Sinclair, of Kirkby-Lonsdale, performed at Carlisle the extraordinary feat of a thousand miles in a thousand hours." This was performed on the "old Carlisle racecourse" (Fawcett, who differs a little again in that he states the wager was for 500 guineas and the date 1704). Wilson, however, says the Linsay-Singleton carrier partnership was struck up after the 1715 Rising and that according to parish records Edward Linsay married in 1736 while Singleton's wife and newborn son died in the same year -- so there is something like a 35 year discrepancy and the names do not match! Were there two wagers of this sort, the later following the example set by the first? Was Wilson mistaken in his facts, wherever he got them from? It is hard to judge, because even Youatt was not contemporary with the 1000 hour feat performed in 1701. His first edition of "The Horse" is 120 years later ( "The Horse" was constantly in print from its first edition through to the 20th century; Garnett's copy was dated 1831, and the 4th edition is dated 1908). He is nearer to the ride in time than is Wilson; Wilson gives more detail. If anyone has access to the sources either is quoting, or to records from Kirkby Lonsdale we would welcome information to clear this up. A similar though less gruelling feat was performed in 1754 by a Mr Corker when he rode a Galloway pony 100 miles a day for 3 consecutive days over the Newmarket race course. Terms: Ponies, Galloways, and Cobs The real feature in all these tales is the remarkable endurance of ponies covering long distances without much rest. Partly this can be explained by the animals working long days in their normal job and being fit and conditioned to such stresses; but more than one writer has commented on the toughness of ponies, and the ease with which they enable people to travel, when compared with larger types of horse. Encyclopaedia Brittanica, 9th Edition 1881, says a pony "must be less than 52" (13hh) from the ground to the top of the withers; else he is a Galloway." And a cob "should not exceed 14.1hh". In Volume VIII of the Polo Pony Stud Book (1901), an introductory section "The Taproot of Polo Pony Breeding" quotes Mr S Burke who approves several ponies in history that were "not over pony size": the grey Bald Galloway (by St Victor's Barb), who was not only a sire of several top racehorses of his time, but a noted sire of mares in the Thoroughbred stud book; his daughter the Warlock Galloway; the Shield Galloway; and the Mixbury Galloway (Polo Pony Stud Book). The Mixbury Galloway was said to be a pony of 13-2 by the Curwen Barb (from a German magazine of 1825, "Zeitung für Pferdeliebhaber" 1825 Heft 18) owned by the Curwen family from West Cumbria. Whether such well-bred Galloways actually featured in the ancestry of Fell ponies, is very hard to decide; most likely the two strains existed in parallel as cousins through the female line. References for these readings are on the Thanks page. |